You are the Head of Human Resources for a large financial institution. The organisation has recently made a public statement about their commitment to the Voice to Parliament and all employees nationally are now required to have their email signatures include a link to the public statement and RAP. The signature graphic states "We support the Voice to Parliament".
Frank is a high performing employee with a great reputation across the business, plus he is an active member of the diversity and inclusion committee and manages this training for Sydney employees, but he has told you that he does not wish to include the branding for the campaign on his email signature. He believes that the organisation should respect a diversity of views.
Head office has stated that this is a priority and all employees with a company email address must include the statement.
What do you do?
Please share your ethical dilemmas with us - we can post them anonymously. You can email your dilemmas to bfso@ethics.org.au
Photo by Mercedes Mehling on Unsplash